Uploading images to Alamy
I went out to The Garden House on Monday (for reference 11 May 2026) for my usual weekly photo tour and came back with 812 images. Of those maybe a dozen will end up on Alamy for licencing. Why only a dozen? And what do I look for when deciding which of the 812.
Well firstly there are a lot of files that are part of the type of focus stack I've described in a recent post. This produces 5 ORF files and a in-camera stacked JPG. After stacking in Photoshop I end up with a single potentially usable file and six files I don't really need. (though I do tend to keep the ORF files). Not every shot is part of a stack but enough generally are to significantly reduce the images available for selection. Of my initial 812 shots 600 may be part of stacks which then generates a potential 100 images to select from. Quite a few less.
So this...
...is distilled down to this:
A rather nice focus stacked shot of Deutzia x elegantissima 'Rosealind'. Cropped, cleaned up very slightly to remove a few stacking artifacts, it's now one I'd quite happily upload.
Step two is to discard the rubbish. Failed stacks, accidental shutter presses, shots that include labels (always photograph plant labels even if it's plants you know well) that are no longer needed after the images have been captioned, poor compositions etc etc. I'm not looking for images to include. I'm looking for images to exclude.
For example this shot of Anthriscus sylvestris 'Ravenswing' with it's good separation of the subject from a pleasant, blurred background that still shows some context I uploaded:
Whereas this one, with its dark and messy background I excluded. Technically it's good enough to pass Alamy QC. But it's not going to stand out among the other 130 images of the same subject. Not all attempts work.Which brings me to step three. What is already on Alamy, both my own and others images of the same subject? Is an image worth uploading? Sometimes it's easy to decide. Is the image of a new to me subject? If so, take the best shot(s) I can, process well, caption and keyword accurately and upload as long as I consider they meet Alamy's QC standards. I ignore the other three thousand images of the same subject unless mine really are inferior and will forever be overlooked.
Then there are the numerous times when I already have multiple images of a subject on Alamy. I don't want to compete with myself so any new shots have to be superior to what I've already had on sale for a while. In which case I seriously have to think about discarding some of my old images and replacing them with the new.
Then there's selection step four. I generate dozens, if not hundreds, of images of The Garden House monthly. Do I really want to saturate my portfolio with hundreds of images of just one garden. No. A reasonable number, taken through the year, chosen for the light and composition, are far more effective than simply uploading everything that's of a decent technical standard. And that's another set of images excluded.
So, that's how 812 images becomes maybe a dozen uploaded. Maybe a few more, oft times less. But I think it gives me a better, more curated portfolio.




No comments:
Post a Comment